The ProtekDuo in ECMO configuration for ARDS secondary to COVID-19: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Assessment of the results of the ProtekDuo cannula applied for dedicated right ventricular support with oxygenator in ARDS secondary to COVID-19. METHODS: Systematic literature search in NHS library, Medline (Pubmed) and EMBASE using appropriate keywords as well as PICOS and PRISMA approach. RESULTS: Out of 285 publications found, 5 publications met the search criteria and were included in this review. A total of 194 patients with ARDS secondary to COVID-19 underwent ProtekDuo placement to establish a combination of respiratory [veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO)] and right ventricular support. Patients treated using the ProtekDuo cannula had survival rates between 59% and 89% throughout the five studies, and a significant survival benefit when compared to an invasive ventilation group or compared to dual site V-V ECMO or other double lumen ECMO cannulas. One study focused on extubation and discontinuation of ventilator support, which could be achieved in 100% of ProtekDuo patients. An association for reduced incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and use of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) could be shown when the ProtekDuo was used. CONCLUSION: Only limited literature is available for the ProtekDuo in V-P ECMO configuration in the setting of COVID-19 ARDS and should be interpreted with caution. Data on the ProtekDuo is suggestive for lower rates of mortality, AKI and CRRT as compared to other respiratory support modalities.

Urgent endovascular aortic dissection repair in a Marfan patient during COVID-19 pandemic.

Although Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair is usually applied to patients without connective tissue disorders, our case shows its potential for complicated type B aortic dissection in a Marfan patient as a feasible alternative to open redo surgery with good short-term outcomes.

ECMO Assistance during Mechanical Ventilation: Effects Induced on Energetic and Haemodynamic Variables.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Simulation in cardiovascular medicine may help clinicians understand the important events occurring during mechanical ventilation and circulatory support. During the COVID-19 pandemic, a significant number of patients have required hospital admission to tertiary referral centres for concomitant mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Nevertheless, the management of ventilated patients on circulatory support can be quite challenging. Therefore, we sought to review the management of these patients based on the analysis of haemodynamic and energetic parameters using numerical simulations generated by a software package named CARDIOSIM©. METHODS: New modules of the systemic circulation and ECMO were implemented in CARDIOSIM© platform. This is a modular software simulator of the cardiovascular system used in research, clinical and e-learning environment. The new structure of the developed modules is based on the concept of lumped (0-D) numerical modelling. Different ECMO configurations have been connected to the cardiovascular network to reproduce Veno-Arterial (VA) and Veno-Venous (VV) ECMO assistance. The advantages and limitations of different ECMO cannulation strategies have been considered. We have used literature data to validate the effects of a combined ventilation and ECMO support strategy. RESULTS: The results have shown that our simulations reproduced the typical effects induced during mechanical ventilation and ECMO assistance. We focused our attention on ECMO with triple cannulation such as Veno-Ventricular-Arterial (VV-A) and Veno-Atrial-Arterial (VA-A) configurations to improve the hemodynamic and energetic conditions of a virtual patient. Simulations of VV-A and VA-A assistance with and without mechanical ventilation have generated specific effects on cardiac output, coupling of arterial and ventricular elastance for both ventricles, mean pulmonary pressure, external work and pressure volume area. CONCLUSION: The new modules of the systemic circulation and ECMO support allowed the study of the effects induced by concomitant mechanical ventilation and circulatory support. Based on our clinical experience during the COVID-19 pandemic, numerical simulations may help clinicians with data analysis and treatment optimisation of patients requiring both mechanical ventilation and circulatory support.